September 13, 2016
Last September Joe Biden and Loretta
Lynch announced that the Obama administration would be “working” with
the United Nations to form a global law enforcement agency that would
have policing authority inside of the United States.
Two years earlier the Obama
administration signed the United Nations Small Arms Treaty in an attempt
to “backdoor” the nullification of the Second Amendment.
The mainstream media ignored the
unconstitutional aspect of these Obama actions choosing to ignore almost
all of both stories while providing only a highly biased limited slice
of coverage to the small arms treaty. When
others in the alternative media covered Obama’s illegal overreach of
American law they were labeled as conspiracy theorists and their reports
were dismissed as untruthful or unnecessary scaremonering.
But nowhere does the Constitution give the president authority to quarter foreign troops on U.S. soil. If
anything, the presence of foreign military personnel within our borders
qualifies as an act of war requiring the president to be responsible
for their immediate removal.
Still, with the aid of a compliant Republican legislature, Obama went ahead with plans for a pact with the U.N. calling it the Strong Cities Network.
Fast-forward nine months and this was the scene on US Interstate 81 in Virginia last Friday:
Can’t begin to tell you how many of these I passed today on 81 near Lexington, VA. Interesting times ahead!” – Jeff Stern Facebook poster
The materiel movement comes less than a
year after the president’s highly controversial Jade Helm exercises that
saw him welcome massive amounts of U.N. materiel and personnel onto our
shores:
There is no allowance in the enumerated
powers of the U.S. Constitution that gives the president or any other
branch of the federal government any authority to police American
citizens. This has been left to the states and to their municipalities.
If anything, our Constitution’s Framers
believed that this relationship should work in the reverse and that it
was incumbent on the citizens to police the government:
“What country can preserve its
liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their
people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.”
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787
So what is the president up to? Local
police forces and each state’s National Guard units have proven more
than capable of quelling civil unrest within their communities when
they’ve called upon to do so and there is nothing to suggest that might
no longer be the case.
For an answer to this question we can turn to this United Nations Careers job posting:
Two years ago the Activist Post had come across this listing and followed with this analysis:
“The U.N. is hiring a “Disarmament,
Demobilization, and Re-integration (DDR) officer” for the apparent
purpose of disarming American citizens as the “duty station” is New York
City, USA.
“The U.N. defines
“disarmament” as “the collection, documentation, control and disposal
of small arms, ammunition, explosives and light and heavy weapons from
combatants and often from the civilian population.”
“The U.N.’s help wanted ad reads:
These positions are located in field
missions of Peace Operations. The DDR Officer typically reports to the
head of a work unit or to a senior official responsible for DDR
operations in a field location, though this may vary depending on the
mission structure. The focus of these jobs is to lead the planning,
implementation, monitoring and evaluation of DDR programmes, operations
and other related activities in the country or region concerned.
“The definitions giving by the U.N. for the other activities appear to be nefarious in their own right:
Demobilization is the
formal and controlled discharge of active combatants from armed forces
and groups, including a phase of “reinsertion” which provides short-term
assistance to ex-combatants.
Reintegration is the
process by which ex-combatants acquire civilian status and gain
sustainable employment and income. It is a political, social and
economic process with an open time-frame, primarily taking place in
communities at the local level.
“The want ad makes no other reference
to a “country or region concerned” other than the “duty station” in New
York which is also the location of U.N. headquarters.
“But if this position is indeed for field work in the U.S., it raises a whole series of
sovereignty issues especially as it
pertains to “the collection, documentation, control and disposal of
small arms, ammunition” from the civilian population.
This job description sounds eerily
similar to the work that U.S. troops were called upon to do in Kabul
where they went door-to-door disarming Iraqis.
Today a number of independent reports
claim that multiple C-130’s and C-136’s with U.N. markings have been
landing at Barksdale AFB carrying U.N. troops. Several U.S. military personnel are reporting that upon arrival, “the UN troops are given US military clothing and name tags.” To read more go to govtslaves.info. This is a measured and balanced must read that points out these troops “have
no loyalty to our Constitution, they have no loyalty to the inherent
rights that have always been ours as American citizens, and they have no
basis for restraint in any action they might perceive as necessary,
regardless of our laws.”
It is highly unusual for presidents to overstep their Constitutional powers. It would be even more unusual for a president to do so with no purpose in mind. Coupled
with the refusal of Republicans to challenge the president on this, or
any other of his globalist initiatives, we are left asking what do they
have planned?
No comments:
Post a Comment