The Mysterious Disappearance of Former Clinton Foundation CEO Eric Braverman

As the FBI continues its widespread investigation into the foundation, Braverman's vanishing act has the internet wondering and the mainstream media curiously disinterested.

Eric Braverman, the Clinton Foundation CEO from 2013 until 2015,  has apparently been missing since October. His absence has fueled speculations in the blogosphere but so far has been ignored by the media. 

Some speculate, with good reason, that Braverman may have gone into hiding after an email mentioning his name was released by Wikileaks on October 22 of this year. In the March 2015 email exchange, Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden told Clinton campaign manager and confidant John Podesta there was a mole within the Clinton Foundation. Podesta in his reply told Tanden the mole was Braverman.

Braverman had abruptly resigned from the Clinton Foundation shortly before this email exchange took place. And then, after the email exchange was made public by Wikileaks, Braverman vanished from the public eye.
This seems like a story that someone might want to report.
 
The last evidence of Braverman’s public activity was October 12, when he posted his last tweet on Twitter. (Usually he tweets about once a month. His “husband,” Neil Brown, hasn’t tweeted since August, although he rarely tweets.) I left a voicemail on Braverman’s personal phone and sent him an email, but received no response. He is still listed as a lecturer at Yale University and, contrary to some reports, there is a record of his lectures going back several years. I contacted the press office and Braverman’s department at Yale and received no response.

Braverman, the Podesta Leaks and the Clinton Foundation

Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, told The Daily Mail that Podesta’s emails were leaked to the organization by a disgruntled insider, not the Russians. Consequently, there are suspicions it may have been Braverman. (Though some of the Podesta emails are dated after Braverman’s tenure with the foundation, if he had Podesta’s password, he could still have accessed his email after leaving.)

Rachel Alexander < Back to Voices

Rachel Alexander is a senior editor at The Stream. She is a political columnist and the founder and editor of Intellectual Conservative.
She is a regular contributor to Townhall, the Selous Foundation for Public Policy Research, The Christian Post and Right Wing News. She frequently appears on TV and news radio as a conservative commentator, and hosted a radio show on 960 KKNT in Phoenix and then on UStream. 
She is a recovering attorney and former gun magazine editor. She previously served as an Assistant Attorney General for the State of Arizona, corporate attorney for Go Daddy Software, and Special Assistant/Deputy County Attorney for the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office.
She was ranked by Right Wing News as one of the 50 Best Conservative Columnists from 2011-2015 and is a recipient of Americans for Prosperity’s RightOnline Activist of the Year award

 

What Obama is doing now may be his MOST heinous and nefarious act yet

By Allen West   December 30, 2016

What we’re witnessing in America is beyond belief, as if Roman Emperor Nero has been reincarnated in President Barack Hussein Obama. In his dwindling days, Nero began to demonstrate certain instability, and as story tells it, he famously fiddled while Rome burned. Some have written that Nero ordered the fires to be started himself. And in these final days, 21 days, 4 hours, 30 minutes and 50 seconds of the Obama administration, we find the disturbing and disconcerting actions of one who is starting fires while he plays golf. 

There’s no logical explanation to the deeds being done by Obama in these final days. Last week’s undermining and betrayal of Israel cannot be explained away by any 90-minute diatribe by John Kerry. We’ve shared the history of the word “Palestine” on these pages. And to have Obama craft language, abstain from a vote, and allow such an anti-Israel resolution to pass through the U.N. Security Council is inexplicable, other than seeking to usher in the demise of a recognized nation-state. 

The recent sanctions and expulsions of Russian officials from America is unconscionable. After all the previous provocations of Russia against the United States, why now, with three weeks before the inauguration of a new presidential administration, does this happen?

Russia Reveals CNN Repeatedly FAKED News To Help Obama Administration

Posted on December 30, 2016 by Thomas Robertson

In a remarkable move, considering the short period of time left in office and lack of publicly available evidence supporting their claims, President Barack Obama’s administration recently announced new sanctions against Russia, which included expelling some 35 diplomats and the closure of at least two Russian compounds in the United States in response to allegations of Russian cyber attacks against U.S. targets.

According to CNN, a statement from the White House said: “Russia’s cyber activities were intended to influence the election, erode faith in US democratic institutions, sow doubt about the integrity of our electoral process, and undermine confidence in the institutions of the U.S. government. These actions are unacceptable and will not be tolerated.”
CNN also reported that, in response to the new sanctions, the Russian government had ordered the closure of an Anglo-American school in Moscow that served to educate the children of diplomats, embassy personnel and foreign nationals from English-speaking nations like the U.S., the U.K. and Canada.

That report of retaliation, however, has been vigorously disputed by the Russian Foreign Ministry, at least according to Russian news agency TASS.

Russia reported that the CNN claim of the school being closed was absolutely false, according to a statement posted to Facebook by foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria 
Zakharovawa.

“U.S. officials ‘anonymously informed’ their media that Russia closed the Anglo-American School in Moscow as a retaliatory measure,” Zakharova wrote. “That’s a lie. Apparently the White House has completely lost its senses and began inventing sanctions against its own children.”

“You should not write that ‘Moscow denied … or Moscow will not…’. Write as it is: ‘The CNN TV channel and other Western media have again spread false information citing official American sources,’” she added.

To be sure, considering the rebuttal was coming from a Russian government spokesperson through a Russian government-controlled media outlet, this report could very well be disinformation or propaganda.

That said, considering the initial report of the school closure came from CNN citing an unnamed U.S. government official, the CNN report is just as likely to be a bit of disinformation or propaganda as well, or, to use the current favored dog whistle of the left, it is “fake news” at its worst.

Rather ironic in light of how much of a stink CNN has made over “fake news” the past couple of months.

(via: Conservative Tribune)

California Democrats 'legalize child prostitutio

  Chelsea Schilling

Teens 'free to have sex in exchange for money without fear of arrest or prosecution'

 

SACRAMENTO – Beginning on Jan. 1, child prostitution will be legal in the streets of California.

In fact, police officers in the state will be banned from arresting any person under the age of 18 for soliciting or loitering with intent, according to Senate Bill 1322. California Gov. Jerry Brown signed the bill on Sept. 26, and it will go into effect Sunday.

The law also requires police to report allegations of child prostitution to county child welfare agencies.

Advocates of the law say it will help child victims of sex trafficking get treatment rather than sending them to juvenile hall and tagging them with a rap sheet for prostitution.
State Sen. Holly J. Mitchell, D-Los Angeles, who introduced the bill, said, “The law is supposed to protect vulnerable children from adult abuse, yet we brand kids enmeshed in sex-for-pay with a scarlet ‘P’ and leave them subject to shame and prosecution. This is our opportunity to do what we say is right in cases of sex trafficking: stop the exploiters and help the exploited.”

But Travis Allen, a Republican lawmaker representing the 72nd Assembly District in the California Legislature, warned of the fallout from what he called a “terribly destructive legislation [that] was written and passed by the progressive Democrats who control California’s state government.”
“[T]eenage girls (and boys) in California will soon be free to have sex in exchange for money without fear of arrest or prosecution,” Allen wrote in a column published by the Washington Examiner.

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND’s Email News Alerts!
Allen acknowledged that Democrats sincerely believe the law will help child sex victims, but he issued a dire warning about the “immoral” consequences of decriminalizing child prostitution.

“Unfortunately, the reality is that the legalization of underage prostitution suffers from the fatal defect endemic to progressive-left policymaking: it ignores experience, common sense and most of all human nature — especially its darker side,” Allen explained.

“The unintended but predictable consequence of how the real villains — pimps and other traffickers in human misery — will respond to this new law isn’t difficult to foresee. Pimping and pandering will still be against the law whether it involves running adult women or young girls. But legalizing child prostitution will only incentivize the increased exploitation of underage girls. Immunity from arrest means law enforcement can’t interfere with minors engaging in prostitution — which translates into bigger and better cash flow for the pimps. 

Simply put, more time on the street and less time in jail means more money for pimps, and more victims for them to exploit.”

Other experts agreed with Allen’s assessment.

Paul Durenberger, an assistant chief district attorney in Sacramento County who oversees human trafficking cases, told the Sacramento Bee in February that the legislation is similar to “bills that a trafficker would want to write to protect themselves.”
Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O’Malley, a respected leader on the issue of human trafficking, said the law “just opens up the door for traffickers to use these kids to commit crimes and exploit them even worse.”

The Bee noted that a program in Sacramento already relocates sexually exploited children from juvenile hall to treatment programs. Upon completion of the programs, child sex victims are cleared of charges.

Allen argued that when police officers take child prostitutes into custody, it helps young sex-trafficking victims escape their abusers.

“Minors involved in prostitution are clearly victims, and allowing our law enforcement officers to pick these minors up and get them away from their pimps and into custody is a dramatically better solution than making it legal for them to sell themselves for sex,” he wrote. “That only deepens their victimization and renders law enforcement powerless to stop the cycle of abuse. SB 1322 is not simply misguided — its consequences are immoral.”

California’s sex trafficking industry is notoriously large. In 2016 so far, there have been 307 cases of trafficking involving children and teens reported to the National Human Trafficking Resource Center. In 2015, the federal government selected Sacramento as one of six U.S. cities to flagship a national enforcement team focused on stopping human trafficking.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/12/california-democrats-legalize-child-prostitution-2/#FyUGfylJEgzO5vP6.99

Netanyahu: Kerry’s biased against Israel ignores "root of the conflict"

by Mike Truman | Dec 28, 2016 | Conservative Views

Benjamin Netanyahu reacted to Kerry’s lame speech about why the U.S. did not veto the Palestinian inspired UN resolution dealing with Israeli settlements. He said that Kerry “obsessively dealt with settlements,” which the United States strongly opposes.

Bibi also accused John Kerry of not touching upon ‘the root of the conflict,’ which is the “Palestinian opposition to a Jewish state in any boundaries.”

This is precisely what the Palestinians want–what many Muslims in the Middle East want. That’s why the Hamas rockets had “Death to Israel” written on them in Hebrew. 
Even the Koran says: “drive them out from where they drove you out” (2:191).  But the Palestinians like to pretend that Israel is theirs, just like other Muslims pretend that they discovered North America.  Erdogan of Turkey said exactly that–if you’d like to see the speech, click here.  

In an English language statement by the Israeli PM’s Office, Netanyahu said, “Like the Security Council resolution that Secretary Kerry advanced in the U.N., his speech tonight was skewed against Israel.”

Netanyahu said the Kerry and his hair “obsessively dealt with settlements,” and he accused Lurch of barely touching upon “the root of the conflict–Palestinian opposition to a Jewish state in any boundaries.”

I tweeted that Kerry’s speech was so filled with fertilizer that it could have covered all of the Middle East three feet deep.

k

Colorado gun law backfires; Wyoming loads up with Magpul deal

Dec. 27, 2016, by Joey Bunch, ColoradoPolitics.com


 n a Feb. 28, 2013, file photo, workers assemble 30-round capacity ammunition magazines for high-velocity rifles, inside the Magpul Industries plant in Erie. (Brennan Linsley/AP)


Magpul Industries announced a mega-deal to supply ammunition magazines to the Marines last week, a boon for Cheyenne and a loss for Colorado.

Magpul, one of the country’s largest producers of ammunition magazines and other accessories, left Colorado in protest of the state’s 2013 gun laws that limited the size of magazines to 15 rounds.

In 2013, when Democrats controlled the state House, Senate and governor’s office, Colorado passed a 15-round limit as a measure to curb mass shootings, particularly in the wake of the 2012 Aurora theater assault that left 12 people dead and more than 70 wounded. Among James Holmes’ weapons was a semi-automatic rifle with a 100-round drum magazine.
The political and legal fallout came swiftly. Gun rights supporters recalled two legislators and another resigned. State sheriffs sued in vain to block the law. The economic cost is still adding up.

Magpul moved its production, distribution and shipping operations to Cheyenne and its headquarters to Texas last year. Besides principle, the move was fueled by cash—the  Wyoming State Loan and Investment Board ponied up $8.3 million

At the time the deal closed in September 2014, the Wyoming Business Council said Magpul would pay back about $3.7 million, but Laramie County, Wyo., stood to gain another $14.3 million in taxes, income off leases and other benefits from growing its workforce.

Magpul took about 100 employees out of Colorado in early 2015. When the gun law was passed in 2013, it had about 200 workers in a 100,000-square-foot in Erie. The payroll has since grown to 380 and added a second shift in 185,000-square-foot facility in Cheyenne.

The dollar value of the contract with the Marine Corps was not estimated by Magpul or the U.S. Department of Defense, but it promises to be lucrative. Magpul will be the exclusive provider for magazines Marines carry into combat.
Frustration was in the voice of Colorado Senate President Kevin Grantham Tuesday.

“My take is there is no big surprise here,” said the Republican leader from Canon City. “You tell a company they can’t sell a product in your state, when it’s a good product and a popular product. They move across the state line, they get a lot of support and they get a big contract. We lost not only the jobs they had when they were here, we lost  the jobs they’ve grown into since and we’re losing all the jobs they’re going to grow into in future years with this contract.

“Once you have the Marine contract, I don’t see how the other branches won’t follow suit eventually. That’s a massive, massive contract just a short distance down the road. We lost that.”

On the other hand?

“What good did this gun law do? Not a blasted bit,” Grantham said.

Top 10 Stupidest New Laws in California for 2017

by Assemblyman Tim Donnelly29 Dec 2016

I’m not in the habit of complaining at the outset of a column, but I’ve taken on a nearly impossible task — figuring out which, of the hundreds of new California laws about to go into effect, are the stupidest.

Don’t laugh.  I’m serious.

It’s really, really hard to keep the list at 10 with hundreds of hare-brained schemes that became real laws.

After all, for far too long, the California legislature has been a “conservative-free zone” — even though there were a handful of “Republicans” occupying seats and taking up space.

I’m going to list the new laws in order of their egregiousness to me, but I’m open to additions or wholesale re-ordering if you care to comment.

Given that Californians are facing 898 new laws going into effect on January 1st, 2017, there’s plenty to hate.

1. Prop. 63: “2nd Amendment Nullification” Act.  Although various portions go into effect in various years — yes, they staggered implementation of this “critically needed reform,” some out to 2019 — this is the most sweeping assault on our long-cherished, God-given natural right as Americans to protect our lives and our freedom.  It requires you to pass a background check and pay for a permit to buy ammunition for the gun you may have just passed a background check to buy.  Yeah, that’ll stop criminals — who buy their guns and ammo in parking lots from other criminals. WooHoo! Next, it makes high-capacity magazine (any magazine that holds more than 10 rounds) illegal to possess — even if you bought it prior to the current ban and ownership was previously considered grandfathered.  This law should make it clear that the goal of the left is not “safety” — it’s control.
2. SB880: “Bullet Button Ban.”  For years, California Democrats have sought to ban a made-up classification of semi-auto rifles with “evil features” that they re-named “assault weapons” for propaganda purposes. Every year, California Democrats attempt to increase control over this “hated group” of guns — until they finally outright ban all semi-automatics.  This law will not do a single thing to further public safety, as the San Bernardino terrorist attack illustrated — determined mass murderers will simply ignore and work around all gun control laws — as if they are just words on paper. One last bit of irony: in a previous legislative session, this same bill was sponsored by none other than disgraced State Senator Leland Yee. If that name sounds familiar, you’re right.  Leland Yee wanted to “protect” Californians from “assault weapons” on our streets — that is, until he was arrested for trafficking fully automatic weapons and rocket-propelled grenades in exchange for campaign contributions.  He’s currently serving a five-year prison sentence.
3. SB3: Minimum Wage Hike to $15/hour by 2020.  As a result of a strong socialist push by unions and complicit governments — such as the union-controlled California legislature—businesses are looking to eliminate as many jobs as possible, investing in automation instead. When you combine this with unchecked illegal immigration — where you have an unlimited labor pool willing to work for subpar wages under the table — the future for entry-level jobs and small business owners in California is bleak.
4. AB1785 The “Hands Free” Law.  This is another example of government gone wild.  AB1785 prescribes driver behavior so severely that in and of itself, I believe it will cause more accidents — and more deaths.  Not only must the phone be dash mounted — meaning you’ll have a permanent distraction right in front of you — but you may not text, take photos or video, or enter GPS destinations while driving. Fat chance of stopping those activities with a mere $20 fine. The bill does stipulate that “the only time a driver is allowed to touch the device is when he or she is activating or deactivating a “feature or function.” However, that process should only involve a “single swipe or tap of the driver’s finger,” according to the bill,” mynewsla.com reports.   How about “hands off” my phone instead of an unenforceable “hands free” law?
5. AB 1732: Single-User Restrooms.  If you’ve ever had to go so badly that you used the opposite sex restroom at a gas station or Starbucks, then perhaps you think this law is needed. But do we really need another law regulating bathrooms? Some businesses have already put signs on their single-use restrooms designating use by either sex.  And sometimes people just take it upon themselves. I can’t help but think this law is unnecessary and diminishes us as a society a little.
6. SB 1383: Controlling Cow Flatulence.  Not making this up.  In spite of the fact that 53 California dairy farmers went bankrupt, moved out of state, or just closed down this year, the Marxist-Progressives are back at it again. Capture cow farts or suffer heavy fines.  CARB (CA Air Resources Board) suggests inserting a tube into the cow’s digestive system and venting into a backpack.  Even liberals admit that laws like this, where government tries to control the uncontrollable, can have undesirable economic consequences.  Lost jobs, lost industries, lost revenue. Stupid law.
7. AB 857: Ghost Gun Ban.  Even if you manufacture your own gun — starting with an 80% receiver — that requires you to have special skills and tools to complete the machining, you must now register it and obtain a serial number from the California Department of Justice.  The purpose of this law is simply to record your name and your firearm on a list for eventual confiscation.  Once again, control — not public safety — is the goal.
8. Prop. 65: Plastic Bag Ban. Since I’ve written extensively about how stupid I think the Plastic Bag Ban is, I won’t revisit the original bill.  But the idea of siphoning off the money collected and diverting it to fund some environmental activist group that will work to further restrict our freedom is nuts.
9. Prop. 57:  Early Release for so-called Non-Violent Criminals.  This was Governor Jerry Brown’s baby — the crown jewel of his prison reform initiatives. Among those offenses he considers “non-violent”:  rape of an unconscious person; human trafficking involving sex acts with minors; and assault with a deadly weapon. Blogger Felicia Wilson summed it up well (original emphasis):  “…Call me crazy, but shouldn’t a crime that includes the word rape or assault be considered, I don’t know… violent?”
10. AB 2466: Felons Voting. Low-Level felons serving sentences outside of state prison get to keep their right to vote.  Hmm. Wonder which party this could possibly help?  Just like the “illegal alien vote,”  Democrats will have the felon vote locked down. This is simply about protecting their power and making it permanent.                                                                                                           When California Democrats promised to take to the streets to defend the rights of convicted felons, illegal aliens and welfare recipients, they weren’t kidding. If only they were as serious about cracking down on immigration cheats and violent criminals as they are about penalizing law-abiding citizens and gun owners, California would have more jobs, less crime — and might be a place people want to come to instead of fleeing.
    
    Tim Donnelly is a Former California State Assemblyman. FaceBook: https://www.facebook.com/tim.donnelly.12/ Twitter: @PatriotNotPol
                            

The 20 ways Obama Used his Presidency To Set Israel Up For Destruction

Posted on December 29, 2016 By Steve Baldwin

---

Steve Baldwin is a 35-year veteran of the conservative movement. He is the author of From Crayons to Condoms, the former executive director of Young Americans for Freedom, the former executive director of the Council for National Policy and a former California state legislator.
More about Steve Baldwin

The recent sell out by Obama in which, for the first time ever, the U.S. refused to veto an anti-Israel U.N. resolution concerning Israeli settlements was just the tip of an iceberg.  Indeed, while Obama pretended to be pro-Israel, he and his team of anti-Semitic middle eastern advisors did everything they could over the last 8 years to undermine Israel, clearly in an attempt to weaken them so that they would eventually be destroyed by their Islamic neighbors.

The propaganda campaign initiated by Obama to convince wealthy American Jews that he was pro-Israel was a masterpiece of deception but with a compliant media that refused to cover his multitude of anti-Israeli policies and actions, we should not be surprised that many Jews to this day think Obama was a supporter of Israel.

First, its needs to be made clear that both President Obama and his first Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, have long histories of associating with anti-Israel and anti-Semitic people and organizations. Obama has been associated with a large number of notorious anti-Semitic and anti-Israel activists such as Palestinian activists Rashid Khalid and Ali Abunimah, anti-Israel activist Bettylu Saltzman, his pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, anti-Israel Rabbi Arnold Wolf, and the late notorious pro-PLO professor Edward Said, not to mention dozens of his own appointees — such as Chuck Hagel, Robert Malley, and Samantha Power—have long histories of anti-Israel actions and statements.  These are not just acquaintances of Obama, but people he has been associated with for decades.

And Hillary Clinton is no different. Her closest advisor while Secretary of State was Sidney Blumenthal, a long-time Israel hater whose son, Max, is a professional anti-Israel hater and author; indeed his latest book was even attacked by liberals for being too anti-Israel but his father aggressively defended it. In 2010, private emails released by the State Department show Sidney Blumenthal urging Clinton to take a harder line on the Israel-Palestinian peace talks.  What’s more troubling, however, are the emails showing the elder Blumenthal forwarding many of his son’s rabidly anti-Israel articles to Clinton, to which she responded with compliments such as “Pls congratulate Max for another impressive piece. He’s so good.”
  
Israeli officials, both on and off the record, state that Obama and his two Secretaries of State (Clinton and Sen. John Kerry) have pursued the most anti-Israel foreign policy in history and have thus endangered Israel’s survival. According to Israel Today, officials close to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described Obama in 2010 as a “strategic catastrophe” for Israel and a “serious threat to the future of the State of Israel.” They also said “President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have drawn a clear line, supporting the Palestinian position.”  In 2012, Danny Danon, the Deputy Speaker of Israel’s Knesset said that “Obama’s victory demonstrates that the state of Israel must take care of its own interests….Obama has hurt the United States by his naïve leadership in foreign policy, which prefers the Arab world over the Western world, along with Israel.”  This type of language from Israeli officials is unheard of in the past.

1. Not only has Obama ordered Israel to not bomb Iran’s nuclear weapons facilities, but Obama reportedly threatened to shoot down any Israeli jets attempting to bomb Iran.  For the first few years of the Obama presidency, Obama officials repeatedly told the media they were unsure if Iran was building the bomb, even though our intelligence agencies knew it was occurring.  Then, once Iran’s bomb making program became more advanced, the Obama administration warned Israel to not bomb them, claiming more time was needed for sanctions to work and that they “could be undone if [Iran] was attacked prematurely.” 
   By 2014, Iran’s program was at a turning point and Israel reportedly decided they had to bomb Iran’s facilities or else end up being threatened perpetually by Iran, but Obama saved Iran again by threatening to shoot down Israel’s jets, according to a Kuwaiti newspaper story based on a conversation with an Israeli minister. Of course, this is denied by Obama. Then, the Obama government negotiated the nuclear accord with Iran, which gives official recognition to its nuclear weapons program while still allowing nuclear weapons to be developed. As a result, it is now nearly impossible for Israel to bomb Iran’s nuclear weapons facilities due to the political and diplomatic fall-out that would likely occur.   Obama essentially used his eight years of office to protect the Iranian nuclear weapons program from its early stages to the point at which it may be impossible to stop.    Once again, Obama has asserted himself to be the protector of Muslims at America’s expense. Indeed, for the first time ever, a radical Islamist country dedicated to the destruction of Israel and the U.S. will have a nuclear bomb in just a few years.
   
2. The Obama Administration leaked Israeli military secrets in order to prevent them from even considering bombing Iran’s nuclear facilities. Obama officials started to leak top secrets in order to embarrass Israel and expose its plans to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power.  Obama officials leaked a story that Israel’s spy agency, the Moussad, assassinated some of Iran’s nuclear scientists in the hopes of slowing down its nuclear weapons program. Info about a covert deal was leaked in which Saudi Arabia would allow Israel to use its airspace to attack Iran.  It was also leaked that Azerbaijan offered Israel use of an airbase to attack Iran and finally it was leaked that the Israelis are funding and training the Iranian opposition group Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK). The purpose of these leaks is to prepare Iran to detect any possible Israeli air strikes so that Iran will continue to be a nuclear power in the Middle East. 
3.   Obama ordered the surveillance of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu because he feared Israel was planning to bomb Iran to stop its nuclear weapons program. Naturally, Israel has considered this option since, after all, Iran has repeatedly called for Israel’s destruction and Israel has every right to preempt Iran.  But instead of working to stop Iran from further developing its nuclear weapons program, Obama has ordered the NSA to monitor Netanyahu, which may be a first for the U.S.  According the Wall Street Journal, Obama has shut down spying on most American allies, but not Israel.
4. While Obama and Secretaries Clinton and Kerry have helped Iran become a nuclear power, they have simultaneously undermined Israel’s nuclear program by banning its scientists from U.S. universities and exposing details of its nuclear program. The U.S. has always kept what it knows about Israel’s nuclear weapons program secret—until now.  After all, Israel is the leading target worldwide of Islamic terror and without nuclear weapons for self defense, it would have been destroyed by now.  In 2015, Obama’s Pentagon declassified a 1987 report on Israel’s nuclear weapons program. As Israel National News wrote, Israel’s nuclear program was “a highly covert topic that Israel has never formally announced to avoid a regional nuclear arms race, and which the U.S. until now has respected by remaining silent.”  Moreover, Israel Today reported that not only has Obama refused to give visas to Israeli nuclear scientists to attend American universities but have placed an unofficial embargo on parts needed for Israel’s nuclear reactor.  Obama’s obsession with embarrassing Israel may have contributed to a Middle East Arms race. 
   But hostility toward Israel’s nuclear weapons program dates back to the beginning of the Obama presidency.  In 2010, Obama and Secretary Clinton hosted a nuclear security summit in Washington DC, but Israel refused to attend because Netanyahu “didn’t want another lecture by Hillary” nor did he want to listen to endless attacks on Israel by radical Islamic regimes such as Turkey.  Once again, the Obama administration allows events they control to be turned into anti-Israel propaganda events by radical Islamic regimes.   Meanwhile, the Obama administration has done everything possible to help Iran become a nuclear power.
   
   
   
   1. The State Department under Secretary Clinton excluded Israel from its “Global Counter-Terrorism Forum (GCT)” even though Israel is the world’s leading target of terrorism. The Global Counter-terrorism Forum is the brainchild of the Obama administration and is supposed to be a forum whereby countries around the world can discuss the terror threat. However, not only did Clinton exclude Israel, she also invited Islamic countries who support terrorism such as Turkey, and, at the time, Egypt.  Indeed, the GCT was actually co-chaired by Turkey, which finances the Hamas terrorist group and has been funding ISIS by buying looted Iraqi oil from them. In her opening comments at the Forum, Clinton named many terrorist groups and movements, but she did not mention Hamas or any terror attacks on Israel.  It was as if Israel did not exist. It has been reported that the U.S. excluded Israel to appease Turkey, whose leader is close to Obama despite his extreme anti-Israel actions. As the Washington Times reports, “Snubbing Israel in order to make friends with the Muslim world is not only a mistake, it is dangerous. By capitulating to Islamist demands to exclude Israel in global counter-terrorism efforts, refusing to define terrorist conduct, and precluding the use of Israel’s expertise in defeating it, the Obama administration puts freedom at risk worldwide.“  Clearly, the forum was apparently a PR stunt to make it appear as if Secretary Clinton was actually doing something to counter terrorism.
   2. The U.S., led by Secretary John Kerry, abandoned Israel within the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). The UNHRC is a U.N. committee run by some of the world’s worst human rights abusers such as Cuba, Congo, and a slew of fundamental Islamic regimes that don’t even grant basic rights to its citizens such as freedom of religion. Nevertheless, the U.S. has always used its UNHRC membership to stop anti-Israel resolutions, which seem to be the main reason it exists.  While the UNHRC constantly attacks Israel’s human rights record – the only democracy in the Middle East – it remains silent regarding the lack of any human rights in countries such as Iran. In 2015, the U.S. for the first time ever, did NOT take to the floor at a UNHRC session to defend Israel against outrageous allegations by “Palestinian” terrorist groups.  Once again, the Obama Administration took the side of radical Islamic regimes.  Israel is the ONLY country whose human rights record is discussed at every UNHRC session.
   3. When Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu visited Washington D.C. to give his historic speech to Congress in 2015, the White House would not meet with him. Obama was outraged by the speech, simply because Netanyahu was giving facts about Iran’s nuclear program that his administration was keeping from the American people. Obama’s excuse for not meeting with Netanyahu was because, “We do not see heads of state or candidates in close proximity to their election” so as to “avoid the appearance of influencing a democratic election in a foreign country.”  But that excuse, it is now known, was false as it has been revealed that the Obama administration was, at the time, meddling in Netanyahu’s reelection and only a few weeks earlier had sent Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry to quietly meet with Netanyahu’s opponent, Isaac Herzog.
   4. Obama and his Secretaries of State constantly attack Israel for stalling the Israeli-Palestinian peace process but promote terms and use language that make it impossible for Israel to agree to the creation of a Palestinian state. Obama, Clinton and Kerry constantly define the Israeli-Arab crisis using “moral equivalency” terms, as if both sides are responsible for Islamic terror attacks upon Israel. When Israel was created by the UN after WW11, it was mostly a barren desert completely surrounded by Islamic enemies that did not recognize its right to exist.  But Jews have lived in the Palestine area since biblical days whereas most Arab citizens are descendants of those who migrated there in the 1920’s from Egypt, Yemen, Syria, etc. to seek jobs  created by the native Jews in what was then called the British Mandate of Palestine. This is why the “Palestinian” label used by Obama and the international left is essentially a phony label since Arabs have less of a legit claim to this label than do the Jews.  Indeed, some of the most prominent “Palestinian” leaders, such as the late PLO leader Yasser Arafat, are Egyptian born.
      Indeed, Obama and his State Department have endorsed the Palestinian demand that “the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states.”  Obama is referring to the border before the 1967 war, a proposal which leaves Israel only nine miles wide and  are “indefensible” as it would leave most Israeli cities open to rocket attacks.  Nor does the proposal force the Palestinians to recognize Israel.   Secretary Clinton also supported the same borders:  “We [support]…the Palestinian goal of an independent and viable state, based on the 1967 lines, with agreed swaps.”
      
      After all, it would be useless to go forward in a peace process unless the Palestinians recognized Israel.  Otherwise, Israel would end up with a hostile terrorist state on its border committed to its destruction.  But incredibly, the Obama administration has insisted that “there is no need for Palestinian Authority (PA) to recognize Israel as a Jewish state as part of a peace agreement.”  Israel obviously does not hold that view so it appears the Obama/Clinton/Kerry team have been arguing the Palestinian side even since Obama’s election; no wonder there’s never been any peace or any treaty.  The obstacle to an Israel/Palestinian treaty is not Israel, but the Obama administration.  Not surprisingly, Obama and Secretaries Clinton and Kerry have always blamed Israel for the breakdown in peace talks, never the Palestinians.
      
      Nor will there ever be a treaty as long as America’s leaders use the language of Israel’s enemies.  For example, Obama constantly uses the word “occupation” to describe land Israel has come to possess to prevent rocket attacks.  Secretary Clinton, in her book Hard Choices, refers to Israel as an “occupying force” and calls Gaza and the West Bank  “occupied territories.”  Her book, in general, sounds like it was written by Hamas:  “I’m not making excuse for the missed opportunities of the Israelis, or the lack of generosity, the lack of empathy that I think goes hand-in-hand with the suspicion, So, yes, there is more that the Israelis need to do to really demonstrate that they do understand the pain of an oppress people in their minds, and they want to figure out, within the bounds of security and a Jewish democratic state, what can be accomplished.”  Bear in mind that the “oppressed” Arabs constitute 21% of Israel’s population and have all the rights of Israelis:  voting rights, free speech, free press, etc.  Arabs within Israel have more rights and freedom than they would in most Arab counties. In fact, Israel is one of the few countries in the Middle East where women – both Arab and Jewish — are allowed to vote.
      
      Secretary of State Kerry says that Israel is becoming an “apartheid” state.   Such language by U.S. officials gives credibility to the radical Islamic ideology which is, at heart, anti-Semitic, anti-Western and will always be opposed to Israel.
      
      Obama has even said because Israel is “stalling” the peace process, it will be difficult for him to continue defending Israel within the U.N.  But no such threat has ever been directed toward the Palestinians.  Obama commonly utters inane phrases such as telling Israel to “search your souls” and “engage in serious self-reflection” but says nothing of the sort to the Palestinians.  Obama says that “You [Israel] have to recognize that they have legitimate claims, and this is their land and neighborhood as well.”  But the Arabs are not entitled to any of Israel’s land  created by the U.N. in the aftermath of World War 11, and any contiguous land held by Israel today was “no-mans” land previously occupied by Jordan, but not owned by them. When Jordan used this land in the West Bank area to illegally attack Israel, they lost legal control of it. Nevertheless, Obama’s main goal has been to make the world believe that the burden is upon Israel to make peace and not upon the Islamic terrorists who portray themselves as phony “Palestinians.”
   5. Obama secretly pursued a U.N. Security Council Resolution that unilaterally gave the Palestinians a state without any Israeli input. DEBKA File, the respected intelligence journal, reported that a number of countries led by France were preparing a U.N. Security Council resolution that recognized the Palestinian state.  The plan was to have it voted on by the entire U.N. and essentially forced down Israel’s throat. The only way a resolution like this would pass is with the consent and support of the Obama administration and the Debka file reported that Obama did indeed give the green light to Israel’s opponents to proceed with the resolution. Indeed, DEBKA reported that U.S. officials even met with French officials to plot the U.N. strategy. This would be contrary to long standing bi-partisan American policy to defend Israel from its enemies at the U.N. and to only support a solution that both Israel and the Palestinians would agree to. The proposal, it is said, would push Israel back to its pre June, 1967 lines, which leaves Israel completely vulnerable to attack.  East Jerusalem would be given to the Palestinians but nothing is being demanded of the Palestinians in return except maybe an unenforceable promise to stop their terrorist attacks on Israel. Nor will the Palestinians have to recognize Israel. As Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas states, “We shall never agree to recognize the Jewish state.”   Once the U.N. recognizes a Palestinian state, then Islamic regimes and terrorists would be empowered to attack Israel without legal repercussions
   6. The Obama Administration and Secretary Kerry illegally intervened in the reelection of Benjamin Netanyahu’s election by funneling State Department grants to opposition groups. Obama’s State Department gave $350,000 to a group called “One Voice” for originally doing work to support “peace negotiation between Israel and Palestine,” However, there were funds left over and the group than used its infrastructure to organized against the reelection of Netanyahu.  They contracted out a group called “V15,” which in turned hired five campaign experts from the U.S., including Obama’s crack field director from his last presidential campaign.  An investigation by the U.S. Senate found that the “State Department failed to adequately guard against the risk that resources  built with government grants would be deployed for political purposes.” As with most investigations of Obama scandals, emails documenting the election activity were destroyed.  Once, again, the Obama administration illegally does whatever it wants to do.
   7. In 2014, the Hamas terrorist group that controls Gaza initiated multiple attacks on Israel, using both rockets and tunnels, but Obama’s reaction was to call for a “cease-fire.” In 2005, Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza, forcibly uprooting 8,500 Jewish settlers, leaving the Palestinians free to form its own government in Gaza which came to be controlled by the Hamas terrorist group. However, instead of focusing on governing, Hamas used its control of Gaza to launch assaults on Israel using rockets and an underground network of tunnels to infiltrate terrorists into Israel.   But instead of urging Israel to use this opportunity to crush the Hamas terrorists, Obama demanded that Israel agree to a cease fire even though Hamas never abides by cease-fires.  In Obama’s view, it is improper for Israel to defend themselves from Islamic terror attacks.   Once again, Obama took the Palestinian side.  As a side note, Obama illegally received over $30,000 in campaign donations from Gaza during his 2008 campaign for president.
   8. After Netanyahu’s victory, the White House had a tantrum and White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough gave a speech in which he declared that “an occupation that has lasted for almost 50 years must end.” He was referring to Israel’s control of the West Bank, a necessity due to how Islamic terrorists have used the West Bank to initiate terror attacks on Israel. McDonough also said that Israel’s “borders should be based on the 1967 lines, and robust provisions that safeguard Israel’s security.”   Again, a return to the 1967 lines will lead to Israel’s destruction.  Either the Obama Administration doesn’t understand this or does not seem to care.
   9. Obama and Secretaries Clinton and Kerry used the phony “settlements” issue to whip up opposition to Israel in an effort to force them to give up more land and thus give radical Islamists the ability to destroy Israel.  The central problem is that whenever Israel gives up disputed land, it is used by Islamists to launch attacks on Israel.  Nevertheless, Obama, beginning in 2009, has constantly attacked Israel for its “settlements.”   This, despite the fact that over the last decade Israel has already uprooted thousands of settlers from their homes in Gaza and the West Bank and vacated entire cities in Judea and Samaria.  In return, more terrorist rockets came raining down upon them. Nevertheless, Secretary Clinton was the point person from 2009-2013 in opposing all settlements:  “And I was often the designated yeller. Something would happen, a new settlement announcement would come and I would call him [Netanahuya] up, ‘what are you doing, you’ve got to stop this.’” However, oftentimes, these settlements were not out in the middle of some disputed isolated territory but rather Clinton was referring to new home construction in areas long inhabited by Jews and owned by Israel ever since the 1967 war when Israel was attacked by its Arab neighbors.  This land was “no-mans” land that no one owned before 1967.  Likewise, when Obama announced that “The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements” he was referring to home construction in East Jerusalem, home construction which has been occurring in the suburbs of Jerusalem since 1967.  As Netanyahu told Obama: “Jerusalem is NOT a settlement; Jerusalem is the capital of the state of Israel.”
      Nevertheless, Secretary Clinton berated Prime Minister Netanyahu in a 45 minute phone call telling him that the “settlements” had “harmed the bilateral relationship” and then she joined the rest of the world in condemning Israel.   No American administration before Obama has ever called for stopping home construction in areas Israel now owns, nor do they have the right to do so. As the Wall Street Journal editorialized, “All Israel has done is insist that Jews have a right to live anywhere in their capital city…Mr. Obama’s public endorsement of the Palestinian view of what constitutes a settlement only puts the negotiated peace he seeks further out of reach.”
       
   10. Obama, Secretary Clinton and Secretary Kerry lied to Congress in order to provide funding for the Palestinian Authority (PA), which is controlled by Hamas, a terrorist group. Each year Obama has been in power, his administration has been required to obtain waivers of congressional restrictions in order to give, on average, $500 million to the Palestinian Authority (PA).  It is illegal to allocate money to terrorist groups but nevertheless, the PA funds terror activities dedicated to the destruction of Israel.  Indeed, the PA’s leader, Mahmoud Abbas, not only “welcomes every drop of blood spilled” attacking Israel, but actually pays the families of “martyrs” who kill themselves in anti-Israel terror acts. Moreover, Hamas controls the PA and is actually listed as a terrorist group by the State Department. In order to allocate U.S. tax dollars to the PA, Obama’s State Department has had to prepare a false report every year from 2009 to the present – to Congress — verifying the PA’s commitment to non-violence.   For example, Secretary Clinton submitted a report to Congress in 2011 which stated that “PA President Mahmoud Abbas consistently reiterated [his] commitment to nonviolence.”   Palestinians are not taxed so Obama apparently feels obligated to use American tax dollars to fund the PA’s budget.
   11. Obama and Secretaries Clinton and Kerry have given credibility to the Palestinian Authority (PA), and to its aligned terrorist groups Hamas and Fatah, even though they refuse to recognize Israel’s right to exist. Led by President Mahmoud Abbas, the PA brainwashes Arab school children to hate Israel, calls for the destruction of Israel, and pays the salaries of imprisoned terrorists. Abbas even advocates terror acts against Israel as when he states, “Each drop of blood that was spilled in Jerusalem is pure blood as long as it’s for the sake of Allah. Every Martyr will be in heaven….”   Incredibly, Obama refers to Abbas as “somebody who has been committed to nonviolence” and claims he is “prepared to negotiate seriously.” Nevertheless, Obama supports the PA and has warned Israel to “make peace” soon or they will be “more isolated internationally.”  No such warnings were issued to the Palestinians even though Abbas stated “We shall never agree to recognize the Jewish State.”  In 2014, when the Palestinians formed a “Government of National Unity,” uniting both the Hamas and Fatah terrorist groups, the U.S. State Department, under Secretary Kerry, quickly declared its willingness to work with it.
   12. Secretary Clinton supported the UN Security Council statement that condemned “acts” by Israel for stopping and searching a phony “humanitarian” flotilla that had armed activists aboard. The “flotilla” was organized by a radical Islamic group that attempted to bypass the Israeli naval blockade along the Gaza coast.  It was falsely claimed that its cargo was full of humanitarian supplies, but when Israeli commanders unloaded the boats, they found ammunition and weapons intended for the Hamas terrorist group. This is precisely why Israel had a blockade in effect. Despite Israeli warnings the ships would be searched – as all ships were – the ships refused to comply. When Israeli commandos boarded one ship, they were shot, stabbed and attacked with clubs.  Nine Flotilla members were killed and 7 Israeli soldiers injured.  It was clearly a propaganda stunt but the U.S. abandoned Israel and voted with U.N.’s Security Council to condemn what happened. There was no criticism of the phony “humanitarian” activists who provoked Israel.  Flotilla members, incidentally, were armed and wore bullet proof vests and night vision masks.  The U.S. could have stopped the U.N. resolution since all U.N. Security Council resolutions require unanimity. Once again, the Obama Administration sided with countries who want to destroy Israel.
       Obama then demanded that Israel give an account as to what had happened but there were no such inquiries about the terrorists behind the flotilla.  This kind of reaction by the Obama Administration sent a sign to Israel’s enemies to continue its attacks on Israel and to launch more “flotillas.”
   13. The Obama administration and its State Department continue to find ways to undermine or demean Israel as part of an administration-wide effort. When Congressional oversight committees investigated the IRS for purposely denying the granting of tax exempt status to Tea Party groups, they also discovered that groups supporting Israel were also being denied tax exempt status.  Such an illegal policy had to originate from the White House.  Secondly, the State Department, for the first time ever, allowed the PLO office in Washington DC to fly the Palestinian flag and assume the diplomatic title of “delegation” even though Palestine is not a legal state.  Third, Obama’s Customs and Border Protection Service has joined the EU in requiring that all West Bank products crossing the U.S. border cannot be marked “Israel” or be subject to “enforcement actions.”  Instead, such products will have to be labeled as coming from a “settlement” in the West Bank territory since, as State Department spokesman Mark Toner said, “We do not consider settlements to be part of Israel.”  It is clear that Obama’s hostility to Israel permeates his entire government.
   14. Obama’s State Department under Secretary Kerry Refuses to Renew Emergency Oil Supply Pact with Israel. For 40 years, the U.S. has had an agreement with Israel by which it guarantees a supply of oil to Israel in times of emergency, such as when they’re attacked by Islamic nations or when its sea lanes are blockaded by Islamic countries.  The agreement expired in 2014 and everyone expected it to be renewed. It wasn’t.  There is no logical reason for not renewing this agreement unless Obama simply doesn’t care about Israel’s survival.
   15. Jerusalem is the capital of Israel but the Obama Administration wants to give half of it to the Palestinians. The Palestinians are demanding that half of Jerusalem be given to a new   Palestinian state, so that has also become the view of the Obama administration.  However, both Obama and Clinton held different views on Jerusalem while campaigning for presidency in 2008.   Obama, in a 2008 AIPAC speech, said he supported Jerusalem as Israel’s undivided capital, but quickly reversed days later, stating  the issue must be “negotiated” with the Palestinians. Likewise, Clinton issued a campaign paper in which it declared Israel has a “right to exist in safety as a Jewish state, with defensive borders and an undivided Jerusalem as its capital….” Today, however, Clinton now toes the Palestinian line in saying that the status of Israel “is an issue to be settled at the negotiating table.” Contrary to popular mythology, Jerusalem holds no particular scared status for Muslims. Indeed, Jerusalem is mentioned in the Bible 600 times and not once in the Koran, so historically, the Jewish people have far more substantial historical and religious claims to Jerusalem.  However, the Obama administration treats Jerusalem as a separate country in order to appease the Palestinians.   When Clinton’s State Department issued a press release in 2011 about the State Department’s #2 official, James Steinberg, visiting Israel, it said Steinberg would be visiting “Israel, Jerusalem, and the West Bank,” as if Jerusalem were separate from Israel.   In 2012, State Department official Victoria Nuland refused to say that Jerusalem, Israel’s capital since 1967, was even a part of Israel, saying “it’s got to be resolved through negotiations between the parties.”  At a 2012 press briefing, White House Spokesman Jay Carney refused to identify which city is the capital of Israel. Moreover, the Obama administration argued before the Supreme Court in opposition to a 2002 law passed by Congress that permitted Americans born in Jerusalem to list Israel as their official birthplace on U.S. passports. The court ruled in favor of Obama, allowing his administration to prevent Americans born in Jerusalem to list Israel as their birthplace.  Strangely, this position was also supported by the Bush Administration.

The ACLU Is Backing Illegal Immigrants Who Are Suing For Being Denied Welfare By This State

By Phoenix Brooks | 

Maine’s efforts to reform the state’s welfare system has met with opposition from the Left at every turn, and its newest attempts to deny welfare to those who are not legally in the United States is no exception.

Maine has been working to reform its welfare programs, especially after learning that millions of food stamp dollars are being spent outside of the state, including in Florida’s Disney World. From Front Page Magazine:

“According to Department of Health and Human Service records, cash welfare users from Maine have spent $2.8 million outside of the state over the last three years – and not just in neighboring New Hampshire.

According to HHS records, the top recipients of Maine’s welfare cash are: New Hampshire: $1.4 million; Massachusetts: $360,000; Florida: $206,000; and New York: $100,000.”

Last year, the state passed legislation that would require any Able Bodied Adult Without Dependents (ABAWD) to either find a part-time job, or to volunteer for an average of 6 hours a week in order to qualify for food stamps. If the ABAWD is unable to satisfy either of the requirements within 3 months, then the state would deny subsequent renewals or applications for at least a year.

To be clear, an ABAWD is a person who is perfectly capable of working, who does not have a disability, and who is not charged with taking care of any children or incapacitated elderly individuals. These are people who literally do not have an excuse to not find work of some kind.

Since enacting the policy, the state has seen the number of individuals on food stamps drop my more than 80%, a sure sign that the policy is working, yet the Liberals of the state were quick to point out that the legislation was unfair. They claimed that the regulations were unattainable by citizens, and that there just wasn’t enough work or volunteer opportunities to make it effective.

The state has also cracked down on the possibility of illegal immigrants getting access to the American tax-payer funded programs, and as a result, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed a lawsuit against the state on behalf of those who are not in the country legally.

Maine’s Department of Health and Human Services has released new regulations regarding General Assistance, and have stipulated that only those who are “legally present” in the United States, or who have applied for asylum, should be granted General Assistance.

In other words, if you are going to get free money from the American tax-payers, one of the requirements is now going to be that your presence in the country is not breaking any laws. The Liberals of the country seem to be doing their very best to ensure that as many people are on the government dole, even if they aren’t citizens.

 

While You Celebrated Christmas, Obama Gave FULL CONTROL Of Christian Holy Sites To Muslims

Christianity's most holy sites was just given away to Muslim extremists!

By Prissy Holly December 27, 2016

With just under a month before Barack Hussein Obama vacates the White House, he is pulling out all the stops to screw over America and our allies. And while everyone was celebrating Christmas, this slime-ball did something so disgusting as a full-out assault on our Judaeo-Christian beliefs, that it fully solidifies who this man truly is, if there was any doubt left in anyone’s mind.

Back in 2015 as the Islamic State was still rising to power, they carried out a massacre so horrifying that it sent ripples throughout the globe. The Christian Yazidis found themselves surrounded on Mount Sinjar, after thousands of men, women, and children had attempted to flee into the mountains.

 

Trapped with no food or water, they were sitting ducks until ISIS decided to massacre them or take them as slaves. U.S. forces could’ve easily intervened, rescuing these Christians by landing a helicopter on the mountain. But Obama couldn’t be bothered to get off his ass and save these trapped Christians, since non-Muslims to Obama apparently aren’t worth saving.
 
If that wasn’t enough to convince you whose side this treasonous POS is on, what happened over Christmas will make you a true believer. Obama has been hell bent on trying to give Israel’s holiest sites of Christendom and Judaism over to Islamist groups ever since he’s been in office. With little success to give away Israel’s sovereignty to the Palestinians in 2013, Obama finally got his way with one final disgusting act carried out over Christmas against all Christians and Jews. Backing the heavily anti-Israel United Nations, Obama signed over our holiest and most historic sites to radical Muslim groups.

 “Barack Obama refused to veto a Security Council resolution condemning settlement construction in the West Bank and east Jerusalem. This resolution effectively turns over the Old City to Palestinian groups,” The Gateway Pundit reported. “The Palestinians are led by Hamas terrorists in Gaza and Fatah Islamists in the West Bank. Obama thought this was a good move.”

Holy sites now under full control of radical Muslim filth include the Via Dolorosa where Jesus walked on his way to the crucifixion, and the tomb of Jesus Christ.

It’s truly vile what Obama has not only done to America, but our Israeli allies as well. Hopefully once Trump is in office he can put an end to this insanity, and give our only friends in the Middle East the support and protection they so desperately need, as they continually fight just for the right to exist.