Wednesday, June 1, 2016

Clinton Is Selling Uranium From Bundy and Hammond Ranches to Russians to Fund Presidential Campaign

CSS Offical-New-Logo2 
clinton 2016  
 When Donald Trump accused Clinton and Obama of creating ISIS, he was absolutely 100% correct. This fact was undeniably established in 2015 when I interviewed former Army Special Operations Officer and advisor to George W. Bush, Scott Bennett. However, this is merely the starting point of this article.

 A Treasonous Conspiracy of Monumental Proportions

Both the Bundy and Hammond Ranch affairs is about control of significant amounts  of uranium and the BLM is willing to shed blood in order to procure this uranium for very nefarious purposes.

This article will unequivocally implicate Hillary Clinton in her role of deliberately committing abject treason against the people of the United States through the illegal appropriation of uranium, at both the Bundy and the Hammond ranches and then selling the uranium to the Russians in order to help fund her presidential run through a largely untraceable offshore account.

I am taken back by the brazenness of the plot. I am even further taken back by the fact this event, as the reader will soon learn, was reported in the New York Times as well as other mainstream media outlets. Is it really necessary to point out that the uranium that Clinton, and the fact that it is subsequently being sold to the Russians, could potentially be used against the American people and its military, in the form of nuclear weapons, and this blood money is helping to fund the presidential campaign of a political despot of epic proportions.

Please walk through with me the progression of the events and facts related to this story which accurately casts Hillary Clinton into the light as the single biggest femme fatale traitor in American History.

Making the Connections Between the Bundy and Hammond Ranches and the Presence of Coveted Uranium

Go to the youtube channel owned by dutchsinse. He makes a very compelling case that several ranches, not just Bundy’s and Hammond’s have been under assault in order to procure precious metals. In the following youtube video, dutchsinse asks the following question:

“Let’s just call it what it is. Human greed is at stake here. Who is going to get the gold back there in the back country? Who is going to get the uranium?”

 

One of the big problems in America today is that “public servants” like Hillary Clinton actually represent a foreign enemy masquerading as a domestic public servant.
  1. I will go one step further than Donald Trump’s assertion that Clinton and state that Hillary Clinton is this generation’s Ethel Rosenberg.  
  2.  
Ethel Rosenberg was convicted and executed for selling nuclear secrets to the Soviets 


Ethel Rosenberg was convicted and executed for selling nuclear secrets to the Soviets
Exclusive!! Want Freedom From Being Censored? 

Hillary Clinton, the Ethel Rosenberg of her generation.  

 

Hillary Clinton, the Ethel Rosenberg of her generation. Clinton sold uranium to the Russians while serving as the Secretary of State and this is what both the Bundy and the Hammond Ranch Affair is all about. And there is nothing to suggest that these nefarious acts are still ongoing.

 
A former key member of the Obama administration and current Presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, has proven herself to be the Ethel Rosenberg of her generation. You may recall your U.S. history as Ethel Rosenberg sold nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War. In an act every bit as egregious as Ethel Rosenberg’s treason, Hillary Clinton sold uranium to the Russians while serving as the Secretary of State. Ironically, the original source on this treasonous act committed by Clinton was none other than the liberal rag we call the  New York Times.

The proof is undeniable that Hillary Clinton committed the treasonous act of selling uranium to the Russians while Secretary of State, as reported in the New York Times. The Russian blood money, as reported, is being held in an offshore account and is being used to fund her run for the Presidency.



A Uranium One sign that points to a 35,000 acre ranch by John Christensen, near the town of Gillette, Wyoming. Uranium One has the mining rights Mr. Christensen’s property.” 

The New York Times further asserts that members of the Canadian mining industry, who have supported Clinton’s campaign, financed and sold off to the Russians a company known as Uranium One. Uranium One is directly responsible for transferring uranium from BLM land to the Russians through an off-shore holding company. Again, according to the NY Times, the Russians, through three separate transactions, acquired Uranium One, while paying off the Clintons and their Canadian partners from 2009-2013.  The business deal also involved paying Bill Clinton $500,000 dollars for a speech on energy which was delivered in Moscow.

Conclusion

If one wants to understand how a 73 year old rancher could be sentenced, as a terrorist, to five years in prison for overseeing a controlled burn, for legitimate purposes, I just told you all you need to know.

Hillary Clinton, the Benghazi murders, 36,000 national security emails on her private computer and now this? And some of you would have the country believe that I am opposed to Hillary Clinton because she is a woman. God help us!


Marines Killed In Bloodbath, Obama Praises Islam Instead

Obama with Muslims 
June 01, 2016   Alex Cooper    



When the Muslim extremist decided to attack the Marine recruiting office in Chattanooga, Tennessee, Obama and his administration did nothing constructive. In fact, Obama actually wished the Muslims a happy end to their holy worship month of Ramadan. He went even further by telling the Marine station they should have kept their blinds shut to avoid any violence. That doesn’t seem like the best plan of action Mr. President.

The attack was committed on a special day where Muslims are allowed to break their fast. Traditionally, this day has been used to offer up sacrifices to Allah. There is no doubt that the horrible actions that were taken against the Marines were done in an effort to praise their twisted Gods.

In regards to this special day called Eid-ul-Fitr Obama made an announcement: “Michelle and I would like to extend our warmest wishes to Muslims in the United States and around the world who are celebrating on this day.” You probably can’t believe what you are reading, but it is absolutely true.

With Ramadan coming to a close, all Obama cared to do was encourage and hold up the Muslim faith. This is the exact same radical religion that pushed the extremist to take the lives of the young men who were in the Marine recruiting station that day. Obama should have been caring about them instead. He should have been there on the scene to assess it for himself and then should have taken actions to not only support the Marines, but make sure that something like that never happened again.

Yet, the Obama that we have come to expect did nothing of the sort. He didn’t even mention the fact that the attack was carried out by radical Islam.

Like and Share this article on Facebook if you agree with us that Obama has all of his priorities misplaced.


Actor Calls Trump Supporters “Whores”, “Struggling” & “The Saddest People”…



Screen Shot 2016-05-31 at 10.06.30 PM 



In an uncalled for Twitter rant on Monday night, an actor went on a rampage of tweets directed at presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump and his supporters. He callded Trump “small d***ed prick” and his supporters “struggling whores.” The tweets were in bad taste, to say the least.
The actor is Hollywood veteran Richard Dreyfuss, known for his infamous role as Matt Hooper in the movie Jaws. Dreyfuss attended the Conservative Political Action Conference to promote civics education in 2011, the same year Trump first arrived on the major political scene.
Trump has yet to respond to Dreyfuss. The tweets from his rant can be viewed below:

Screen Shot 2016-05-31 at 10.03.47 PM

Donald Trump’s “Tough on Crime” Stance Stems from Personal Experience



His tough position on crime is a reflection of personal experience dealing with his mother being a victim of crime,




The GOP presumptive presidential nominee, Donald Trump, explained his vision for America’s criminal justice system in his 2000 book, The America We Deserve.

His tough position on crime is a reflection of his personal experience dealing with his mother being a victim of crime, and living through the heightened crime sprees of the 1970’s to 1990’s in New York City.

In 1991, Trump’s then 79 year-old mother, Mary Trump, walked to a bakery in Queens and was mugged. Instead of picking up her crumb cake, she was thrown to the ground by a 16 year-old thug who also stole her purse. Hitting the concrete caused her brain to hemorrhage, which in turn, caused permanent damage to her eyesight and hearing. The culprit, Paul LoCasto was later sentenced to 3-9 years in prison for his crime.

Of the experience, Trump wrote “… in my family we believe in going the extra mile.” He states that his brother contacted the judge to make sure he could attend the trial with the hope of encouraging the maximum punishment possible. “The Trumps believe in getting even,” he added.

Prior to his mother’s mugging, Trump weighed in publicly to a nationwide news story about another crime victim: the Central Park jogger. In fact, most New Yorkers still remember the brutal attack and rape of a jogger in Central Park in 1989 referred to as “the Central Park 5.” Five teenagers were accused and convicted of raping and brutally beating a female jogger. In response to the media frenzy surrounding the case, Trump took out a full-page ad in four newspapers, with the headline:

“BRING BACK THE DEATH PENALTY! BRING BACK OUR POLICE!”

(More than twenty years later, these five men were released from prison and their convictions were vacated– because they were innocent. Another man confessed to the crime, which was confirmed by a DNA test. New York City settled with the men who were falsely accused and convicted.) Trump wrote in response in The New Yorker that, “These young men do not exactly have the pasts of angels.”
Several years later, in, The America We Deserve, Trump specifically stated that he rejects criminal justice reformers’s arguments, even those made by his friends. He wrote:

“They don’t like building more prisons. They believe, at the bottom of their hearts, that we put too many criminals in jail. It’s an embarrassment to them.
“I like to remind these friends that they would be singing a different tune if they didn’t have a doorman downstairs.”
According to a yet released report by the Brennan Center for Justice Trump’s tough view on crime “has not evolved. Trump’s statements confirm this.

On MSNBC’s Morning Joe, for example, Trump remarked, “No, I’m tough on crime,” meaning, he wasn’t sold on reforming the criminal justice system. “I’m tough on crime, and we have to stop crime. You look at what’s going on in the inner cities right now, it’s unbelievable.”

Earlier this year in March, Trump called for police to arrest protesters at his rallies so that their criminal records would “ruin the rest of their lives,” according to the Brennan Center. It’s no secret that Trump consistently and publicly supports law enforcement, referring to police as “the most mistreated people in this country.”

But in Cleveland, during the GOP Presidential Convention, the delegates will vote on a policy position to reduce the U.S. prison population, which would include reducing the mandatory minimum sentencing for crimes like mugging, of which his mother was a victim.

Only time will tell how tough or soft on crime Trump is. But if the past is any indication, it’s doubtful if he’d substantially change a position he’s held for decades.



Constitutional Law Expert Explains Why The Federal Government Is a “Foreign Entity”


Americans could better protect their freedoms if they understood the basics of the Constitution.
constitution.com
 
 Constitutional Law expert, Ron Gibson joined Jim White and Tim Brown on NorthWest Liberty News to explain what the federal government is according to the U.S. Constitution. He addresses whether or not America is really a country governed by the people and for the people. If so, what is the federal government and why does it exercise so much control over our lives? Some examples include unconstitutional federal gun laws, which violate the Second Amendment, the “law” requiring the purchase of health insurance, the numerous un-elected bureaucrats working in administrative agencies pushing out regulations that do not represent anyone.

Ron Gibson is a former U.S. Marine and Vietnam veteran and now professional consultant and counselor at law with over 45 years of experience in the fields of land patents, mining law, right of way, contracts, water rights, and constitutional law. He is the Vice President of the Southwest Oregon Mining Association and is the Chairman of the Jefferson Mining District located in Southern Oregon. He’s also an entrepreneur, licensed pilot, rancher, and inventor of two environmental cleaning products.


 
 This interview is posted with permission from NorthWest Liberty News.

Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Pedophilia is NOT a Crime – Paving the way for Sharia?


NJXPEDO07C413

Liberal Prof. Margo Kaplan: Pedophilia is NOT a Crime – Paving the way for Sharia?

Margo Kaplan is a special kind of liberal thinker. The special kind that believes all behavior is excusable, because we should all be ‘tolerant’. Well, I have news for you, lady. This isn’t gonna fly with most of mainstream Americans, and probably not many of your colleagues, either.

She has written a precious little article that states, of all things, that now we should accept the PEDOPHILES are victims, too. She’s serious. Like really serious. She explains in an interview below:
 
Margo Kaplan is not very popular today. In the Monday edition of the New York Times, the Rutgers-Camden law professor, an NYU and Harvard graduate, takes to the op-ed pages to argue that we’ve got it all wrong when it comes to pedophilia. She writes that pedophiles don’t necessarily turn out to be child molesters and that pedophilia is not a choice, i.e. a pedophile might be born that way. We reached her in her office in Camden to discuss.

You really lit up the comments section of the op-ed page today.

Yes, but I have to be honest. I am getting more emails of support than I ever expected. I’m shocked. I expected to get maybe 95% negative emails, but I’ve gotten so many positive ones. The online comments, though, are pretty uniformly negative, and a lot of people haven’t even read the article.
I know your pain. Who are you getting these positive emails from?

A lot of people I don’t even know. There’s a former prosecutor, a judge, a nurse. Individuals with family members who have pedophilia.

I know your pain, too. Please read it before sending me an expletive laced email of nonsense. Thank you.


 margokaplan 



How much of the population has pedophilia?
We’re not entirely sure, but the estimates are around one-percent of the male population, and those in the female population are assumed to be much smaller. As far as the number of people with pedophilia who do sex offend and who do not, there are a lot of assumptions but very little data, because we have very little treatment, very little information.


Why is that?

There is so much stigma. There is very little reason to come forth and identify as a pedophile. There are no large scale studies, no large treatment programs, no big research studies on this. I contacted the National Institutes of Health, and they don’t spend any money on pedophilia.


But you are basically saying, hey, let’s take it easy on pedophiles.
Well, but I am not saying that about sex offenders. I say that they remain responsible for their conduct. We need to treat pedophiles before they offend. People see the word “pedophile” and think “sex offender.” People choose to sex offend children. They do not choose to be pedophiles.


There is ‘stigma’ because people DON’T want their kids abused or hurt in anyway. People worry about their kids, this is a natural function in a parent/child relationship.


Since you say there are so many misconceptions, why don’t you tell us what a pedophile really is.

A person with an intense and recurrent sexual attraction to prepubescent children, children who have not yet entered any form of puberty. And according to the DSM [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders], it constitutes a mental disorder when you act on it, but not just that. It also constitutes a mental disorder if it causes “marked distress or interpersonal difficulty,” and, as you can imagine, pedophilia will cause this.

In your article, you open by saying that as a pedophile’s numerical age increases into teenage years and then adulthood, the numerical age of those he is attracted to does not. Are most pedophiles really starting that young?

For many individuals, it is really an onset in adolescence, similar to how many sexual attractions happen. Individuals who are heterosexual, you realize you are attracted to the opposite sex when you are a kid. For a pedophile, you get older, but you keep being attracted to little kids, and many people start to realize this during adolescence. So imagine trying to deal with that during adolescence in addition to the other confusing feelings that you’re having.
If America is totally off course on this issue, is there any country that is getting it right?

We’re not that unique. But Germany is ahead of the curve. They have a large scale treatment program called Prevention Project Dunkenfeld, which is probably the first large scale treatment project that also includes non-offenders. They have billboards everywhere: “Do you have attraction to children in ways that you shouldn’t? You are not responsible for your attraction, but you are responsible for your behavior.”.


Oh, good. She says the pedophiles should be responsible for what they do. Well DUH. Welcome to being an ADULT. This is just despicable. And this is someone teaching! Commence ripping out hair in 5, 4, 3….


While this is ‘hot’, let us consider this: is this another way to allow Muslims to start bringing, or marrying here, their child brides? All in the name of acceptance, the liberals will say. What road are we taking this down? How can we say ANY of this should be acceptable? The slope we are sliding down is slippery indeed when we start talking about this as some sort of ‘alternate’ sexuality or lifestyle. This is a sexual deviance, and the people attracted to children need help for the protection of our kids.

Please share this if you think that pedophilia is a CRIME and shouldn’t be tolerated!

Read more at Joe For America