Disassociating Islam form Terror

Western governments have been infiltrated by, if not terrorist them selves’ apologists for Islam associated acts of terror. So many ‘security’ personnel are recommending not to use terms such as, ‘war against terror’, ‘Jihad’, ‘holy war’, ‘Islamism’, ‘fundamentalism’ or ‘mujahedeen’.

To what end? By not indentifying the true source of terror, we can never defend against it. That is like not being able to use the words ‘murder’ or ‘rape’ or ‘assault’ or ‘robbery’ or some other term that describes a crime during an investigation or reporting on it. How is a reporter to write about a woman being raped if the word ‘rape’ is not allowed to be used? Was she made ‘love’ to? Or if motive in the killing of one’s spouse can not be mentioned, can the act be proven? The three elements used in solving a crime are means, opportunity, and motive. If motive can not be mentioned, no one will be convicted of the crime of murder unless it was videotaped.

Trying to disassociate terror from Islam is like trying to disassociate Nazism form Hitler’s attempted conquests. If Islam, Jihad, is not part of the terror being unleashed on the world then why are they yelling Allahu Akbar as they commit these terror acts? It is stupid to try and divorce the acts from where they are fermented from. It is the Mullahs that call for these Jihad acts to be perpetrated, Islamic nations and charities funding them, and Muslims rejoicing at the devastation they create. They take the credit for those acts. We should not take that away from them. They admit if freely, especially when protected by their peers. They should be punished with the same fervor that the acts are committed.